Electric-to-Gas Substitution: What's the Best Option for Regulators?

Kenneth Costello

The Electricity Journal, 2009, vol. 22, issue 6, 8-28

Abstract: Costs and complexities associated with a centralized planning approach may be too great to justify a strong interventionist approach, in view of scant evidence showing that consumers generally make poor decisions in selecting an energy supplier for specific end uses. Regulators should place the burden on supporters of a centralized approach to show that its benefits would exceed costs.

Date: 2009
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1040-6190(09)00154-7
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:jelect:v:22:y:2009:i:6:p:8-28

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/supportfaq.cws_home/regional
https://shop.elsevie ... _01_ooc_1&version=01

Access Statistics for this article

The Electricity Journal is currently edited by R. Cohen

More articles in The Electricity Journal from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu ().