Debate Response: Which Rate Designs Provide Revenue Stability and Efficient Price Signals? Let the Debate Continue!

David Magnus Boonin

The Electricity Journal, 2009, vol. 22, issue 9, 78-80

Abstract: Let's engage in further discussion that provides solutions and details, not just criticisms and assertions. Let's engage in a meaningful dialogue about the conditions where real-time pricing or critical peak pricing with decoupling or the SFV rate design with a feebate is most effective.

Date: 2009
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1040-6190(09)00229-2
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:jelect:v:22:y:2009:i:9:p:78-80

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/supportfaq.cws_home/regional
https://shop.elsevie ... _01_ooc_1&version=01

Access Statistics for this article

The Electricity Journal is currently edited by R. Cohen

More articles in The Electricity Journal from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu ().