The (Too Short) Extension of Section 1603 Renewable Energy Cash Grants

Paul Dickerson

The Electricity Journal, 2011, vol. 24, issue 2, 27-33

Abstract: If section 1603's planned 2010 expiration was a time bomb, its recent extension has merely replaced a short fuse with an even shorter one. The one-year extension will limit section 1603's effectiveness at encouraging investment and development. Section 1603 deserves to be renewed for the long term, or even made permanent.

Date: 2011
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1040-6190(11)00011-X
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:jelect:v:24:y:2011:i:2:p:27-33

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/supportfaq.cws_home/regional
https://shop.elsevie ... _01_ooc_1&version=01

Access Statistics for this article

The Electricity Journal is currently edited by R. Cohen

More articles in The Electricity Journal from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu ().