The (Too Short) Extension of Section 1603 Renewable Energy Cash Grants
The Electricity Journal, 2011, vol. 24, issue 2, 27-33
If section 1603's planned 2010 expiration was a time bomb, its recent extension has merely replaced a short fuse with an even shorter one. The one-year extension will limit section 1603's effectiveness at encouraging investment and development. Section 1603 deserves to be renewed for the long term, or even made permanent.
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:jelect:v:24:y:2011:i:2:p:27-33
Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
https://shop.elsevie ... _01_ooc_1&version=01
Access Statistics for this article
The Electricity Journal is currently edited by R. Cohen
More articles in The Electricity Journal from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Haili He ().