Mechanism design without revenue equivalence
Juan Carlos Carbajal and
Jeffrey Ely
Journal of Economic Theory, 2013, vol. 148, issue 1, 104-133
Abstract:
We study mechanism design problems in quasi-linear environments where the envelope theorem and revenue equivalence principle fail due to non-convex and non-differentiable valuations. We obtain a characterization of incentive compatibility based on the Mirrlees representation of the indirect utility and a monotonicity condition on the allocation rule, which pin down the range of possible payoffs as a function of the allocation rule. To illustrate our approach we derive the optimal selling mechanism in a buyer–seller situation where the buyer is loss-averse; we find a budget-balanced, efficient mechanism in a public goods location model; and we consider a principal–agent model with ex post non-contractible actions available to the agent.
Keywords: Incentive compatibility; Revenue equivalence; Integral monotonicity; Revenue maximization; Loss aversion; Efficiency; Public goods; Non-contractible actions (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: C72 D44 D70 D82 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2013
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (35)
Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022053112001299
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
Related works:
Working Paper: Mechanism Design Without Revenue Equivalence (2012) 
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:jetheo:v:148:y:2013:i:1:p:104-133
DOI: 10.1016/j.jet.2012.12.014
Access Statistics for this article
Journal of Economic Theory is currently edited by A. Lizzeri and K. Shell
More articles in Journal of Economic Theory from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu ().