Limited commitment and the legal restrictions theory of the demand for money

Leo Ferraris and Fabrizio Mattesini

Journal of Economic Theory, 2014, vol. 151, issue C, 196-215

Abstract: This paper addresses the “rate of return” puzzle of monetary theory. Similarly to the legal restrictions theory of the demand for money, we assume that Government bonds are subject to a minimum purchase requirement. Differently from this theory, however, we assume that intermediaries, when issuing private notes, cannot commit to always redeem them. First, we study an environment with legal restrictions to intermediation and show that cash and interest bearing bonds both circulate in the economy. Then, we drop the legal restrictions and show that also with active intermediation, under limited commitment, there is an equilibrium with rate of return dominance. A positive interest rate provides the intermediaries with the incentive to issue and redeem their notes.

Keywords: Money; Government bonds; Rate of return dominance; Legal restrictions (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: E40 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2014
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (4)

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022053113002123
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

Related works:
Working Paper: Limited Commitment and the Legal Restrictions Theory of the Demand for Money (2013)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:jetheo:v:151:y:2014:i:c:p:196-215

DOI: 10.1016/j.jet.2013.12.008

Access Statistics for this article

Journal of Economic Theory is currently edited by A. Lizzeri and K. Shell

More articles in Journal of Economic Theory from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu ().