A life-cycle model with ambiguous survival beliefs
Max Groneck,
Alexander Ludwig and
Alexander Zimper
Journal of Economic Theory, 2016, vol. 162, issue C, 137-180
Abstract:
Based on a cognitive notion of neo-additive capacities reflecting likelihood insensitivity with respect to survival chances, we construct a Choquet Bayesian learning model over the life-cycle that generates a motivational notion of neo-additive survival beliefs expressing ambiguity attitudes. We embed these neo-additive survival beliefs as decision weights in a Choquet expected utility life-cycle consumption model and calibrate it with data on subjective survival beliefs from the Health and Retirement Study. Our quantitative analysis shows that agents with calibrated neo-additive survival beliefs (i) save less than originally planned, (ii) exhibit undersaving at younger ages, and (iii) hold larger amounts of assets in old age than their rational expectations counterparts who correctly assess their survival chances. Our neo-additive life-cycle model can therefore simultaneously accommodate three important empirical findings on household saving behavior.
Keywords: Bayesian learning; Likelihood insensitivity; Ambiguity; Dynamic inconsistency; Subjective survival beliefs; Saving puzzles (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: D83 D91 E21 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2016
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (24)
Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022053115002100
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
Related works:
Working Paper: A life-cycle model with ambiguous survival beliefs (2015) 
Working Paper: A Life-Cycle Model with Ambiguous Survival Beliefs (2014) 
Working Paper: A Life-Cycle Model with Ambiguous Survival Beliefs (2013) 
Working Paper: A Life-Cycle Model with Ambiguous Survival Beliefs (2013) 
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:jetheo:v:162:y:2016:i:c:p:137-180
DOI: 10.1016/j.jet.2015.12.008
Access Statistics for this article
Journal of Economic Theory is currently edited by A. Lizzeri and K. Shell
More articles in Journal of Economic Theory from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu ().