Chia-Hui Chen and
Journal of Economic Theory, 2018, vol. 177, issue C, 365-404
We consider a bandit problem faced by a team of two heterogeneous players. The team is hierarchical in that one player (the principal) retains the exclusive right to terminate the project while the other player (the agent) focuses strictly on implementing the project assigned. As a key departure from the existing literature, we assume that the principal may be privately informed about the project quality. In contrast to the literature, the belief in our model generally follows a non-monotonic path: while each failure makes the agent less confident in the project, the uninformed principal drops out gradually over time, which partially restores the agent's motivation. We derive explicit solutions for the agent's effort and the principal's exit decisions, which allow us to obtain a full characterization of the equilibrium. Our analysis elucidates how and under what conditions an organization becomes trapped in a stagnant phase in which little action takes place.
Keywords: Bandit problem; Experimentation; Hierarchy; War of attrition; Role specialization (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: D82 D83 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
Working Paper: Hierarchical Experimentation (2015)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:jetheo:v:177:y:2018:i:c:p:365-404
Access Statistics for this article
Journal of Economic Theory is currently edited by A. Lizzeri and K. Shell
More articles in Journal of Economic Theory from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Dana Niculescu ().