EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Survival in speculative markets

Pietro Dindo

Journal of Economic Theory, 2019, vol. 181, issue C, 1-43

Abstract: In this paper, I consider an exchange economy with complete markets where agents have heterogeneous beliefs and, possibly, preferences, and investigate the Market Selection Hypothesis that speculation rewards the agent with the most accurate beliefs. First, on the methodological level, I derive the relative consumption dynamics as a function of agents' effective discount factors, related to consumption decisions across time, and agents' effective beliefs, related to consumption decisions across states. Sufficient conditions for agents' survival, either in isolation or in a group, depend on the relative size of effective discount factors and on the relative accuracy of effective beliefs. Then, I show that in economies where agents maximize an Epstein–Zin utility the Market Selection Hypothesis fails: there exist parametrizations where the agent with correct beliefs vanishes and parametrizations where beliefs heterogeneity persists in the long run. Results are robust to local changes of beliefs, risk preferences, and the aggregate endowment process. These failures are shown not to occur when agents' Epstein–Zin utility has a subjective expected utility representation due to an interdependence of effective discount factors and effective beliefs.

Keywords: Heterogeneous beliefs; Speculation; Market selection hypothesis; Asset pricing; Optimal growth portfolio; Epstein–Zin utility (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: D01 D53 E21 G11 G12 G14 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2019
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (16)

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022053119300122
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:jetheo:v:181:y:2019:i:c:p:1-43

DOI: 10.1016/j.jet.2019.02.002

Access Statistics for this article

Journal of Economic Theory is currently edited by A. Lizzeri and K. Shell

More articles in Journal of Economic Theory from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-19
Handle: RePEc:eee:jetheo:v:181:y:2019:i:c:p:1-43