 Revealed reasoningNick Saponara Journal of Economic Theory, 2022, vol. 199, issue C Abstract: We model a decision maker (DM) making a choice under uncertainty who faces constraints on the set of contingencies she can consider, or reason about, when evaluating a given act (a mapping from states to outcomes). We model the DM's ability to reason about (coarse) contingencies when evaluating a given act using partitions of the state space. A key feature of the model is that the partition may vary with the act the DM is evaluating. This feature allows us to model a DM who, despite her inability to consider every individual state simultaneously, may completely understand the states of the world (in the sense that she may have a well defined prior on the full state space). We argue that this feature allows us to differentiate coarse reasoning from coarse contingencies (as it is typically modeled) and ambiguity aversion, both related phenomena, using only static choice of acts. Our main results axiomatically characterize this model, show how to uniquely identify beliefs in this setting, and uniquely identify the partitions that represent how the DM is able to reason. An application to reasoning about other agents' actions in a mechanism design setting is studied. Keywords: Limited reasoning; Complexity; Coarse contingencies; Ambiguity (search for similar items in EconPapers) Downloads: (external link) Related works: Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:jetheo:v:199:y:2022:i:c:s0022053120300909 DOI: 10.1016/j.jet.2020.105096 Access Statistics for this article Journal of Economic Theory is currently edited by A. Lizzeri and K. Shell More articles in Journal of Economic Theory from Elsevier |
Is your work missing from RePEc? Here is how to contribute.
Questions or problems? Check the EconPapers FAQ or send mail to .
EconPapers is hosted by the
School of Business at Örebro University.