The paradox of search intensity

Chao He and Xiaodong Fan

Journal of Economic Theory, 2024, vol. 221, issue C

Abstract: In standard labor search and matching models, the search intensity (SI) of unemployed workers is procyclical and complements job creation. Both predictions are at odds with the US labor market following the Great Recession. To address these inconsistencies, this paper extends the standard model to incorporate multi-market simultaneous search (MMSS). Adverse aggregate shocks can raise SI as workers simultaneously search in more markets because the incentives are decreasing in the local job-finding rate. This broader search effort leads to higher offer rejection, which in turn discourages firm entry. The offer-rejection externality can result in multiple equilibria. In the calibrated model, a temporary financial crisis can cause a persistent increase in both SI and unemployment.

Keywords: Search intensity; Unemployment; Jobless recovery; Financial shocks (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: E24 J64 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2024
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022053124000978
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:jetheo:v:221:y:2024:i:c:s0022053124000978

DOI: 10.1016/j.jet.2024.105891

Access Statistics for this article

Journal of Economic Theory is currently edited by A. Lizzeri and K. Shell

More articles in Journal of Economic Theory from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu ().