Biased mediation: Selection and effectiveness

Jin Yeub Kim and Jong Jae Lee

Journal of Economic Theory, 2025, vol. 229, issue C

Abstract: This paper presents a theory of mediator selection in conflicts that compares biased and unbiased mediation. We characterize optimal mechanisms used by biased mediators when they are selected into mediation, and determine when and how parties in dispute accept a biased mediator in equilibrium. We find that when asymmetric information is significant, parties accept biased mediation as long as the degree of mediator bias is not too strong. Biased mediators care more about the payoffs of their favored party. Nevertheless, we find that biased mediators can be equally effective in promoting peace as the unbiased mediator. This is because biased mediators use recommendation strategies that allocate more shares of resource to their favored party while providing a higher chance of peaceful settlement to a weaker type of their disfavored party.

Keywords: Biased mediation; Conflict; Mechanism design; Mediator selection (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: C72 D74 D82 F51 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2025
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022053125001152
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:jetheo:v:229:y:2025:i:c:s0022053125001152

DOI: 10.1016/j.jet.2025.106069

Access Statistics for this article

Journal of Economic Theory is currently edited by A. Lizzeri and K. Shell

More articles in Journal of Economic Theory from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu ().