CAPM for estimating the cost of equity capital: Interpreting the empirical evidence
Zhi Da,
Re-Jin Guo and
Ravi Jagannathan
Journal of Financial Economics, 2012, vol. 103, issue 1, 204-220
Abstract:
We argue that the empirical evidence against the capital asset pricing model (CAPM) based on stock returns does not invalidate its use for estimating the cost of capital for projects in making capital budgeting decisions. Because stocks are backed not only by projects in place, but also by the options to modify current projects and undertake new ones, the expected returns on stocks need not satisfy the CAPM even when expected returns of projects do. We provide empirical support for our arguments by developing a method for estimating firms' project CAPM betas and project returns. Our findings justify the continued use of the CAPM by firms in spite of the mounting evidence against it based on the cross section of stock returns.
Keywords: CAPM; Asset pricing anomalies; Cost of capital; Beta; Capital budgeting (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: G1 G12 G13 G30 G31 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2012
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (47)
Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0304405X11001942
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
Related works:
Working Paper: CAPM for Estimating the Cost of Equity Capital: Interpreting the Empirical Evidence (2009) 
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:jfinec:v:103:y:2012:i:1:p:204-220
DOI: 10.1016/j.jfineco.2011.08.011
Access Statistics for this article
Journal of Financial Economics is currently edited by G. William Schwert
More articles in Journal of Financial Economics from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu ().