Economics at your fingertips  

Decision fatigue and heuristic analyst forecasts

David Hirshleifer, Yaron Levi, Ben Lourie and Siew Hong Teoh

Journal of Financial Economics, 2019, vol. 133, issue 1, 83-98

Abstract: Psychological evidence indicates that decision quality declines after an extensive session of decision-making, a phenomenon known as decision fatigue. We study whether decision fatigue affects analysts’ judgments. Analysts cover multiple firms and often issue several forecasts in a single day. We find that forecast accuracy declines over the course of a day as the number of forecasts the analyst has already issued increases. Also consistent with decision fatigue, we find that the more forecasts an analyst issues, the higher the likelihood the analyst resorts to more heuristic decisions by herding more closely with the consensus forecast, self-herding (i.e., reissuing their own previous outstanding forecasts), and issuing a rounded forecast. Finally, we find that the stock market understands these effects and discounts for analyst decision fatigue.

Keywords: Analysts; Decision fatigue; Heuristic; Behavioral finance (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: D03 G14 G20 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2019
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: Track citations by RSS feed

Downloads: (external link)
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

Related works:
Working Paper: Decision Fatigue and Heuristic Analyst Forecasts (2018) Downloads
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link:

Access Statistics for this article

Journal of Financial Economics is currently edited by G. William Schwert

More articles in Journal of Financial Economics from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Dana Niculescu ().

Page updated 2019-08-24
Handle: RePEc:eee:jfinec:v:133:y:2019:i:1:p:83-98