Do underwriters matter? The impact of the near failure of an equity underwriter
Journal of Financial Intermediation, 2012, vol. 21, issue 3, 507-529
The financial crisis provides a natural experiment for testing theoretical predictions of the equity underwriter’s role following an initial public offering. Clients of Bear Stearns, Lehman Brothers, Merrill Lynch, and Wachovia saw their stock prices fall almost 5%, on average, on the day it appeared that these institutions might collapse. The decline was more than 1% lower than the abnormal return of other newly public companies, representing a loss in equity value of almost $3 billion. The price impact was worse for companies with fewer monitors, suggesting that underwriters play an important role in monitoring newly public companies. The abnormal return is more negative for clients that are also lending clients, but is not significantly associated with the role of the underwriter as market maker or counterparty to investors.
Keywords: Investment banking; Financial crisis; IPOs; Underwriting; Event study (search for similar items in EconPapers)
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (4) Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:jfinin:v:21:y:2012:i:3:p:507-529
Access Statistics for this article
Journal of Financial Intermediation is currently edited by Elu von Thadden
More articles in Journal of Financial Intermediation from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Haili He ().