Are contingent convertibles going-concern capital?
George Pennacchi and
Journal of Financial Intermediation, 2020, vol. 43, issue C
Contingent convertibles (CoCos) are intended to either convert to new equity or be written down prior to failure while a bank is a going-concern. Yet, in the first actual test case, CoCos never converted before its bank failed. We develop a model that predicts that CoCos lead to less (more) extreme stock returns and have yields greater than (similar to) standard subordinated debt yields if investors do (do not) expect them to convert or be written down prior to failure. These predictions are tested using data on CoCos issued by European banks during 2011 to 2017. We find evidence that equity conversion CoCos reduce stock return variance and several other measures of downside risk, consistent with the perception that they are going-concern capital. However, we also provide event study evidence that recent regulatory actions reduced the CoCo–subordinated debt yield spread, which indicates a diminished investor belief that CoCos are going-concern capital.
Keywords: Contingent capital; Bank risk; Bank regulation (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: G20 G21 G32 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:jfinin:v:43:y:2020:i:c:s1042957319300245
Access Statistics for this article
Journal of Financial Intermediation is currently edited by Elu von Thadden
More articles in Journal of Financial Intermediation from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Nithya Sathishkumar ().