The effects of restricted abortion access on IUDs and vasectomies: Evidence from Texas

Bradley Crowe, Graham Gardner and Cara Haughey

Journal of Health Economics, 2025, vol. 103, issue C

Abstract: Both contraception and abortion result in fertility reductions, but whether they are substitutes remains an open question. In 2013, Texas passed House Bill 2 (HB2), a policy that imposed strict regulations on abortion providers. Using administrative outpatient records from Texas, we exploit the passage of HB2 to identify the effects of restricted abortion access on the timing and demand for intrauterine devices (IUDs) and vasectomies using an event study design. We find evidence that expectations of limited abortion access significantly increase the demand for IUDs, with no effect on the incidence of vasectomies. These findings support the hypothesis that abortion and contraception are substitutes, particularly for individuals with the capacity to become pregnant.

Keywords: Abortion; Family planning; TRAP laws; Contraception; Long-acting contraception; IUD; Vasectomy (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: I10 I18 J13 J16 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2025
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167629625000761
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:jhecon:v:103:y:2025:i:c:s0167629625000761

DOI: 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2025.103041

Access Statistics for this article

Journal of Health Economics is currently edited by J. P. Newhouse, A. J. Culyer, R. Frank, K. Claxton and T. McGuire

More articles in Journal of Health Economics from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu ().