Aversion to health inequalities and priority setting in health care
Han Bleichrodt,
David Crainich and
Louis Eeckhoudt
Journal of Health Economics, 2008, vol. 27, issue 6, 1594-1604
Abstract:
Traditionally aversion to health inequality is modelled through a concave utility function over health outcomes. Bleichrodt et al. [Bleichrodt, H., Diecidue E., Quiggin J., 2004. Equity weights in the allocation of health care: the rank-dependent QALY model. Journal of Health Economics 23, 157-171] have suggested a "dual" approach based on the introduction of explicit equity weights. The purpose of this paper is to analyze how priorities in health care are determined in the framework of these two models. It turns out that policy implications are highly sensitive to the choice of the model that will represent aversion to health inequality.
Keywords: Equity; Health; Social; welfare (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2008
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (4)
Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167-6296(08)00088-X
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
Related works:
Working Paper: Aversion to health inequalities and priority setting in health care (2009)
Working Paper: Aversion to health inequalities and priority setting in health care (2008)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:jhecon:v:27:y:2008:i:6:p:1594-1604
Access Statistics for this article
Journal of Health Economics is currently edited by J. P. Newhouse, A. J. Culyer, R. Frank, K. Claxton and T. McGuire
More articles in Journal of Health Economics from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu ().