A reply to Gandjour and Gafni

Han Bleichrodt and Martin Filko

Journal of Health Economics, 2010, vol. 29, issue 2, 329-331

Abstract: Gandjour and Gafni (2010) criticize our paper on two counts. Their first point of criticism is ill-founded and results from many mathematical mistakes that they make. The second is due to a lack of understanding of the general principles of empirical research.

Keywords: QALYs; Utility; theory (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2010
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167-6296(10)00002-0
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:jhecon:v:29:y:2010:i:2:p:329-331

Access Statistics for this article

Journal of Health Economics is currently edited by J. P. Newhouse, A. J. Culyer, R. Frank, K. Claxton and T. McGuire

More articles in Journal of Health Economics from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu ().