An elicitation of utility for quality of life under prospect theory
Werner Brouwer (),
l’Haridon, Olivier and
Jose Luis Pinto
Authors registered in the RePEc Author Service: Olivier l'Haridon
Journal of Health Economics, 2016, vol. 48, issue C, 121-134
This paper performs several tests of decision analysis applied to the health domain. First, we conduct a test of the normative expected utility theory. Second, we investigate the possibility to elicit the more general prospect theory. We observe risk aversion for gains and losses and violations of expected utility. These results imply that mechanisms governing decisions in the health domain are similar to those in the monetary domain. However, we also report one important deviation: utility is universally concave for the health outcomes used in this study, in contrast to the commonly found S-shaped utility for monetary outcomes, with concave utility for gains and convex utility for losses.
Keywords: Certainty equivalences; Loss aversion; Prospect theory; QALYs; Utility function (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: I10 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
Working Paper: An elicitation of utility for quality of life under prospect theory (2016)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:jhecon:v:48:y:2016:i:c:p:121-134
Access Statistics for this article
Journal of Health Economics is currently edited by J. P. Newhouse, A. J. Culyer, R. Frank, K. Claxton and T. McGuire
More articles in Journal of Health Economics from Elsevier
Series data maintained by Dana Niculescu ().