EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Do health insurers innovate? Evidence from the anatomy of physician payments

Jeffrey Clemens, Joshua Gottlieb and Timea Laura Molnar

Journal of Health Economics, 2017, vol. 55, issue C, 153-167

Abstract: One of private health insurers’ main roles in the United States is to negotiate physician payment rates on their beneficiaries’ behalf. We show that these rates are often set in reference to a government benchmark, and ask how often private insurers customize their fee schedules away from this default. We exploit changes in Medicare’s payments and dramatic bunching in markups over Medicare’s rates to address this question. Although Medicare’s rates are influential, 25 percent of physician services in our data, representing 45 percent of covered spending, deviate from the benchmark. Heterogeneity in the pervasiveness and direction of deviations suggests that the private market coordinates around Medicare’s pricing for simplicity but abandons it when sufficient value is at stake.

Keywords: Health insurance; Physician payments; Medicare; Payment reform (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2017
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (24)

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167629616305628
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:jhecon:v:55:y:2017:i:c:p:153-167

DOI: 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2017.07.001

Access Statistics for this article

Journal of Health Economics is currently edited by J. P. Newhouse, A. J. Culyer, R. Frank, K. Claxton and T. McGuire

More articles in Journal of Health Economics from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu ().

 
Page updated 2025-04-11
Handle: RePEc:eee:jhecon:v:55:y:2017:i:c:p:153-167