 Information shocks and pharmaceutical firms’ marketing efforts: Evidence from the Chantix black box warning removalEmily C. Lawler and Meghan Skira Journal of Health Economics, 2022, vol. 81, issue C Abstract: We study how pharmaceutical firm marketing responds to a regulatory decision that represents a positive information shock about drug safety. In the context of the smoking cessation drug Chantix, we estimate the effects of a Food and Drug Administration (FDA) decision to remove the drug's black box warning on two forms of marketing: monetary and in-kind payments to physicians (detailing) and direct-to-consumer advertising. Using identification strategies that leverage geographic variation in latent demand for smoking cessation therapy and the targeted nature of the information shock, we find that the removal of the warning significantly increased Chantix-related detailing payments and increased expenditures on national television advertising of Chantix. Understanding these firm-level strategic promotion responses is important, as they have implications for the dissemination of new drug information and the behaviors of physicians and consumers. Keywords: Pharmaceutical marketing; FDA regulation; Smoking cessation; Difference-in-differences (search for similar items in EconPapers) Downloads: (external link) Related works: Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:jhecon:v:81:y:2022:i:c:s0167629621001429 DOI: 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2021.102557 Access Statistics for this article Journal of Health Economics is currently edited by J. P. Newhouse, A. J. Culyer, R. Frank, K. Claxton and T. McGuire More articles in Journal of Health Economics from Elsevier |
Is your work missing from RePEc? Here is how to contribute.
Questions or problems? Check the EconPapers FAQ or send mail to .
EconPapers is hosted by the
School of Business at Örebro University.