Auditor liability to third parties after Sarbanes-Oxley: An international comparison of regulatory and legal reforms
Poonam Puri and
Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation, 2010, vol. 19, issue 1, 66-78
This study compares the status of auditors’ legal liability to third parties in seven countries. It analyzes recent legislation, regulation, and case law as well as pronouncements from national accounting and auditing bodies. With the increasing internationalization of capital markets and audit firms, an understanding of auditor liability on a global basis is important. Our findings show that common law countries (the United States, Canada, the United Kingdom, Australia, and New Zealand) have enacted legislative reforms that directly or indirectly increased auditors’ liability. In contrast, civil law countries (Germany and France) did not mandate legislative or regulatory reforms.
Keywords: Sarbanes-Oxley; Auditor liability; Third parties; Legal system (search for similar items in EconPapers)
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (5) Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:jiaata:v:19:y:2010:i:1:p:66-78
Access Statistics for this article
Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation is currently edited by R. Larson
More articles in Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Haili He ().