Can expertise mitigate auditors’ unintentional biases?
Emiliano Ruiz and
Jose A. Gonzalo-Angulo
Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation, 2015, vol. 24, issue C, 105-117
It is important for both academics and practitioners to understand how biases influence auditing opinions, as well as how we might counteract those biases. According to moral seduction theory, auditors’ judgments are morally induced by conflicts of interest in an unconscious manner. We combined an auditor ethical decision-making model with an expertise model in a laboratory experiment with European auditors to demonstrate that expertise helps to mitigate unconscious reporting bias in the going-concern setting. Our findings suggest that while problem-solving ability reinforces the auditors’ public watchdog function, task-specific experience reduces their fear of provoking the self-fulfilling prophecy effect. Our contribution to the literature is timely since the European Green Paper on Auditing is ignoring auditor education, learning, and training as potentially effective ways to enhance audit quality and increase professional skepticism.
Keywords: Auditing; Conflicts of interest; Unintentional bias; Expertise; Self-fulfilling prophecy effect; Moral seduction theory (search for similar items in EconPapers)
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (4) Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:jiaata:v:24:y:2015:i:c:p:105-117
Access Statistics for this article
Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation is currently edited by R. Larson
More articles in Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Haili He ().