Accounting for productivity: Is it OK to assume that the world is Cobb-Douglas?

Shekhar Aiyar and Carl-Johan Dalgaard

Journal of Macroeconomics, 2009, vol. 31, issue 2, 290-303

Abstract: The development accounting literature almost always assumes a Cobb-Douglas (CD) production function. However, if in reality the elasticity of substitution between capital and labor deviates substantially from 1, the assumption is invalid, potentially casting doubt on the commonly held view that factors of production are relatively unimportant in accounting for differences in labor productivity. We use international data on relative factor shares and capital-output ratios to formulate a number of tests for the validity of the CD assumption. We find that the CD specification performs reasonably well for the purposes of cross-country productivity accounting.

Keywords: Development; accounting; Aggregate; production; function; Elasticity; of; substitution; Total; factor; productivity (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2009
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (29)

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0164-0704(08)00064-5
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

Related works:
Working Paper: Accounting for Productivity: Is it OK to Assume that the World is Cobb-Douglas? (2008)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:jmacro:v:31:y:2009:i:2:p:290-303

Access Statistics for this article

Journal of Macroeconomics is currently edited by Douglas McMillin and Theodore Palivos

More articles in Journal of Macroeconomics from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu ().