Comparing Empirical Likelihood and Bootstrap Hypothesis Tests
Journal of Multivariate Analysis, 1994, vol. 51, issue 2, 277-293
A comparison between empirical likelihood and bootstrap tests for a mean parameter against a series of local alternative hypotheses is made by developing Edgeworth expansions for the power functions of the two tests. For univariate and bivariate cases, practical rules are proposed for choosing the more powerful test.
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (8) Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:jmvana:v:51:y:1994:i:2:p:277-293
Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
https://shop.elsevie ... _01_ooc_1&version=01
Access Statistics for this article
Journal of Multivariate Analysis is currently edited by de Leeuw, J.
More articles in Journal of Multivariate Analysis from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Haili He ().