 On the risk-equivalence of two methods of randomization in statisticsH. P. Kirschner Journal of Multivariate Analysis, 1976, vol. 6, issue 1, 159-166 Abstract: For statistical decision problems, there are two well-known methods of randomization: on the one hand, randomization by means of mixtures of nonrandomized decision functions (randomized decision rules) in the game "statistician against nature," on the other hand, randomization by means of randomized decision functions. In this paper, we consider the problem of risk-equivalence of these two procedures, i.e., imposing fairly general conditions on a nonsequential decision problem, it is shown that to each randomized decision rule, there is a randomized decision function with uniformly the same risk, and vice versa. The crucial argument is based on rewriting risk-equivalence in terms of Choquet's integral representation theorem. It is shown, in addition, that for certain special cases that do not fulfill the assumptions of the Main Theorem, risk-equivalence holds at least partially. Keywords: randomization; Markov; kernels; admissible; structures; Choquet; representation; theory (search for similar items in EconPapers) Downloads: (external link) Related works: Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:jmvana:v:6:y:1976:i:1:p:159-166 Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from Access Statistics for this article Journal of Multivariate Analysis is currently edited by de Leeuw, J. More articles in Journal of Multivariate Analysis from Elsevier |
Is your work missing from RePEc? Here is how to contribute.
Questions or problems? Check the EconPapers FAQ or send mail to .
EconPapers is hosted by the
School of Business at Örebro University.