What have we learned from SFAS 123r and IFRS 2? A review of existing evidence and future research suggestions

Alexander Merz

Journal of Accounting Literature, 2017, vol. 38, issue C, 14-33

Abstract: The fundamental change in accounting rules for equity-based compensation (EBC) instituted by SFAS 123, SFAS 123r, and IFRS 2 has allowed for new insights related to a variety of research questions. This paper discusses the empirical evidence generated in the wake of the new regulation and categorizes it into two broad streams. The first stream encompasses research on the changed use of EBC and the incentives provided. The second stream addresses how firms account for EBC, including the underreporting phenomenon and how it was affected by the mandatory recognition of EBC expenses. I discuss where research delivers unanimous findings versus contradictory results. Using these insights, I make recommendations for further research opportunities in the area of EBC.

Keywords: Executive compensation; Stock options; IFRS 2; SFAS 123r (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2017
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (3)

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0737460716300337
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:joacli:v:38:y:2017:i:c:p:14-33

DOI: 10.1016/j.acclit.2017.06.001

Access Statistics for this article

Journal of Accounting Literature is currently edited by S. Asare and W. R. Knechel

More articles in Journal of Accounting Literature from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu ().