Do audit firm rotation, auditor retention, and joint audits matter? â€“ An experimental investigation of bank directors' and institutional investors' perceptions
Reiner Quick and
Journal of Accounting Literature, 2018, vol. 41, issue C, 1-21
As a consequence of the global financial and economic crisis, the European Commission recently reformed the audit market. One objective was to restore public trust in the auditing profession and thus to enhance the audit function. This study investigates whether perceptions of auditor independence and audit quality are influenced by audit firm rotation, auditor retention and joint audits, because regulators argue that these instruments can improve auditor independence and audit quality. Therefore, we conduct an experiment with bank directors and institutional investors in Germany. The results indicate a negative main effect for joint audits on perceived auditor independence, and that a rotation cycle of 24 years marginally significantly impairs participant perceptions of audit quality, compared to a rotation cycle of only ten years. Besides the main effects, planned contrast tests suggest a negative interaction between rotation and joint audit on participant perceptions of auditor independence. Moreover, a negative interaction effect is revealed between rotation after 24 years and retention on perceptions of audit quality. It is particularly noteworthy that we failed to identify a positive impact of the regulatory measures taken or supported by the European Commission on perceptions of auditor independence and audit quality.
Keywords: Audit firm rotation; Auditor retention; Germany; Independence in appearance; Joint audit; Perceived audit quality (search for similar items in EconPapers)
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:joacli:v:41:y:2018:i:c:p:1-21
Access Statistics for this article
Journal of Accounting Literature is currently edited by S. Asare and W. R. Knechel
More articles in Journal of Accounting Literature from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Dana Niculescu ().