Economics at your fingertips  

Conditional conservatism and labor investment efficiency

Joohyung Ha and Mingming Feng

Journal of Contemporary Accounting and Economics, 2018, vol. 14, issue 2, 143-163

Abstract: Prior literature documents that asymmetric timely recognition of losses versus gains (also known as conditional conservatism) can induce management to make more efficient investment decisions by mitigating information asymmetry between management and investors and providing early signals about the profitability of projects that are undertaken. In this paper, we investigate the impact of conservatism on an important investment decision that has been overlooked, namely, investment in labor. We find that conservatism is negatively associated with labor investment inefficiency; more specifically, conservatism reduces inefficient investment practices on the labor market, including over-hiring, under-firing, under-hiring, and over-firing. Our results hold after controlling for managerial ability, corporate governance, and other investments.

Keywords: Conditional conservatism; Labor investment efficiency (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: M41 M54 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2018
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations Track citations by RSS feed

Downloads: (external link)
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link:

Access Statistics for this article

Journal of Contemporary Accounting and Economics is currently edited by Agnes C.S. Cheng, P. Clarkson, F.A. Gul, Zoltan Matolcsy, Dan Simunic and Ben Srinidhi

More articles in Journal of Contemporary Accounting and Economics from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Dana Niculescu ().

Page updated 2018-11-10
Handle: RePEc:eee:jocaae:v:14:y:2018:i:2:p:143-163