Audit fees around dismissals and resignations: Additional evidence

Paul A. Griffin and David Lont ()

Journal of Contemporary Accounting and Economics, 2011, vol. 7, issue 2, 65-81

Abstract: This paper offers new findings about how audit fees vary around auditor dismissals and resignations. For dismissals, we find evidence of lower than normal fees before and after an auditor change, consistent with the view that both incumbent and successor auditors adjust fees downward to retain the client. Our evidence also shows that incumbent and successor auditors charge unusually high fees before and after a resignation. We interpret the higher than normal incumbent fees as an indication that resignation companies reflect unusual levels of audit effort or risk, which the incumbent auditor captures as additional fees. Eventually, however, the additional fees are insufficient, inducing the incumbent to resign. A fee premium by the successor auditor after resignation also supports this view.

Keywords: Dismissals; Resignations; Audit fees; Incumbent auditor fee adjustments; Event study (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2011
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1815566911000142
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:jocaae:v:7:y:2011:i:2:p:65-81

DOI: 10.1016/j.jcae.2011.10.001

Access Statistics for this article

Journal of Contemporary Accounting and Economics is currently edited by Agnes C.S. Cheng, P. Clarkson, F.A. Gul, Zoltan Matolcsy, Dan Simunic and Ben Srinidhi

More articles in Journal of Contemporary Accounting and Economics from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu ().