Monopolistic supply management in world metals markets: How large was Mount Isa?
Christopher L. Gilbert
Journal of Commodity Markets, 2021, vol. 21, issue C
Standard arguments suggest that mining companies lack sufficient market share to allow profitable exercise of monopoly power. However, low production and consumption elasticities can lead to prices being very sensitive to small supply disruptions. Metals are durable commodities. Supply from stock can offset the impacts of low elasticities in the short run but stocks also prolong the impact of any supply restriction. The interaction between storage and low elasticities can confer pricing power on a producer with a modest market share. I illustrate by looking at Glencore’s “disciplined” supply response when, in October 2015, the company announced a 30% cutback in zinc production. The zinc price more than doubled over the two subsequent years.
Keywords: Monopoly; Durability; Cutbacks; Stocks; Non-ferrous metals; Zinc (search for similar items in EconPapers)
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1) Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:jocoma:v:21:y:2021:i:c:s2405851320300027
Access Statistics for this article
Journal of Commodity Markets is currently edited by Marcel Prokopczuk, Betty Simkins and Sjur Westgaard
More articles in Journal of Commodity Markets from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu ().