An approximate dual-self model and paradoxes of choice under risk
David Levine () and
Journal of Economic Psychology, 2014, vol. 41, issue C, 55-67
We derive a simplified version of the model of Fudenberg and Levine (2006, 2011) and show how this approximate model is useful in explaining choice under risk. We show that in the simple case of three outcomes, the model can generate indifference curves that “fan out” in the Marschak–Machina triangle, and thus can explain the well-known Allais and common ratio paradoxes that models such as prospect theory and regret theory are designed to capture. At the same time, our model is consistent with modern macroeconomic theory and evidence and generates predictions across a much wider set of domains than these models.
Keywords: Common ratio effect; Dual-self process; Allais paradox; Self-control (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: D01 D03 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (7) Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
Working Paper: An approximate dual-self model and paradoxes of choice under risk (2014)
Working Paper: An Approximate Dual-Self Model and Paradoxes of Choice under Risk (2012)
Working Paper: An approximate dual-self model and paradoxes of choice under risk (2012)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:joepsy:v:41:y:2014:i:c:p:55-67
Access Statistics for this article
Journal of Economic Psychology is currently edited by G. Antonides and D. Read
More articles in Journal of Economic Psychology from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Dana Niculescu ().