When losses can be a gain. A large lab-in-the-field experiment on reference dependent forgiveness in Colombia

Enrique Fatas () and Lina Restrepo-Plaza ()

Journal of Economic Psychology, 2022, vol. 88, issue C

Abstract: We test the effectiveness of two behaviorally inspired manipulations promoting forgiveness in a lab-in-the-field experiment in Cali, Colombia. Offenders (mostly juvenile) can only participate in a restorative justice program if victims agree to forgive them and let them participate. In our experiment, 756 participants were recruited using a panel maintained by a large public university. Participants are randomly assigned to one condition in a 2 × 2 between-subjects factorial design. In all conditions, restorative justice is introduced to participants using requests sent by real offenders to victims asking for their forgiveness. In one dimension, we manipulate the way the program is presented to them, using equivalent losses (risks of recidivism) or gains (successful rehabilitation). In the other dimension, we manipulate the default option (forgive or not-to-forgive), from which participants can easily opt-out. Decisions are incentivized by a sequence of lotteries. In all lotteries, a certain option is associated with the benefits of conventional justice (the opportunity cost of restorative justice) and a risky choice represents restorative justice, with large potential earnings (if the offender does not relapse into crime) and a chance of null earnings (if the offender does). Our results show that reluctance to forgive significantly decreases in the domain of losses relative to the domain of gains, while similar reluctance rates are observed in both default conditions. Disclosing objective information about the low recidivism rate of offenders also has a large impact, strongly reducing reluctance to forgive. Consistent with attention-based models, the magnitude of expected losses plays no significant role, and victims of crime are more willing to forgive than non-victims.

Keywords: Forgiveness; Framing; Defaults; Reference dependence; Experiment; Restorative justice (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2022
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (2)

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167487021000933
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:joepsy:v:88:y:2022:i:c:s0167487021000933

DOI: 10.1016/j.joep.2021.102463

Access Statistics for this article

Journal of Economic Psychology is currently edited by G. Antonides and D. Read

More articles in Journal of Economic Psychology from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu ().