A comparative study on precision of direct evaluations, the Pairwise Comparisons Method and the Best-Worst Method

Bice Cavallo and Alessio Ishizaka

Omega, 2025, vol. 130, issue C

Abstract: The aim of this paper is to design, carry out and analyze an experiment with over 100 respondents to measure the precision of the respondents when they compare (by evaluation) the areas of nine geometric figures and five distances between cities by using direct evaluations, Pairwise Comparisons Method and Best-Worst Method. The outcomes of the experiment indicate that the direct evaluations are the most imprecise and that there is not statistically significant difference between Best-Worst Method and Pairwise Comparisons Method.

Keywords: Multi-criteria decision making; Pairwise Comparisons Method; Best-Worst Method (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2025
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0305048324001403
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:jomega:v:130:y:2025:i:c:s0305048324001403

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/supportfaq.cws_home/regional
https://shop.elsevie ... _01_ooc_1&version=01

DOI: 10.1016/j.omega.2024.103175

Access Statistics for this article

Omega is currently edited by B. Lev

More articles in Omega from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu ().