Assessing probability distributions by the fractile method: Evidence from managers

Danny A Samson and Howard Thomas

Omega, 1986, vol. 14, issue 5, 401-407

Abstract: Various approaches have been offered as aids for assessing subjective probability distributions. These include the fractile method, the method of relative heights and applications of psychometric methods, e.g. multi-dimensional scaling. Previous laboratory research has examined and compared these methods primarily using undergraduate students rather than relatively experienced or practising managers. In this study of the fractile method, the experimental subjects were managers who had an ongoing instructional relationship with the authors. Therefore, conclusions can be drawn about practising managers' biases in probability assessment. Groups with more expertise in statistics and more managerial experience were found to be better calibrated than those with lower expertise and less experience. Training was also found to improve assessment performance.

Date: 1986
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0305-0483(86)90081-2
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:jomega:v:14:y:1986:i:5:p:401-407

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/supportfaq.cws_home/regional
https://shop.elsevie ... _01_ooc_1&version=01

Access Statistics for this article

Omega is currently edited by B. Lev

More articles in Omega from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu ().