Improving short-term forecasts

Nr Sanders and Lp Ritzman

Omega, 1990, vol. 18, issue 4, 365-373

Abstract: This empirical study compares the accuracy of combined forecasts, found by averaging individual forecasts from univariate time-series techniques, with judgmental forecasts actually made daily by experienced practitioners in real business settings. The value of judgment is assessed, used alone and in combination with quantitatively derived forecasts. The key finding is that the value of each forecasting approach depends on the characteristics of the time series, namely data variability. Automated quantitative forecasts are superior for time series that are relatively stable. Complete reliance on quantitative procedures is not only more efficient, but reduces forecast errors. However, as the volatility of the time series increases, a point is reached where judgmental inputs are desirable, either to supplement or even to replace the forecasts provided by quantitative techniques.

Keywords: combined; forecasts; forecasting; judgment; time-series; techniques (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 1990
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (5)

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0305-0483(90)90026-6
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:jomega:v:18:y:1990:i:4:p:365-373

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/supportfaq.cws_home/regional
https://shop.elsevie ... _01_ooc_1&version=01

Access Statistics for this article

Omega is currently edited by B. Lev

More articles in Omega from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu ().