Evaluating fixed price incentive contracts

S. C. Ward and C. B. Chapman

Omega, 1995, vol. 23, issue 1, 49-62

Abstract: This paper considers choosing between different forms of fixed price incentive contracts. The analysis assumes the underlying probability density function for project costs is triangular. The methods of evaluation considered are expected value, certainty equivalence and stochastic dominance. The latter two methods take into account the typical risk aversion of contractors and clients. The analytical form of project cost and incentive contract adopted offer a robust analysis suitable for a wide variety of practical situations. However, the methods of evaluation described could be applied to other forms of contract and cost distribution.

Keywords: contracting; risk; analysis; dominance; decision; making (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 1995
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (4)

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0305-0483(94)00047-E
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:jomega:v:23:y:1995:i:1:p:49-62

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/supportfaq.cws_home/regional
https://shop.elsevie ... _01_ooc_1&version=01

Access Statistics for this article

Omega is currently edited by B. Lev

More articles in Omega from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu ().