EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

A quick sufficient solution to the More-for-Less paradox in the transportation problem

Veena Adlakha and Krzysztof Kowalski

Omega, 1998, vol. 26, issue 4, 541-547

Abstract: In a transportation problem, is it possible to find a solution with less (or equal) cost than the optimal solution by shipping more units under the condition that at least the same amount is shipped from each supply point and to each market? This more-for-less analysis could be useful for managers in decisions such as increasing warehouse/plant capacity, or advertising efforts to increase demand at certain markets. In this paper we develop a sufficient condition to identify candidate markets and supply points. The method is easy to apply and can serve as an effective tool for managers in solving the more-for-less paradox for large transportation problems, by providing the user with an insight into the problem. The procedure developed in this paper can also be used as an affective alternate solution algorithm for solving certain transportation problems.

Date: 1998
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (2)

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0305-0483(97)00070-4
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:jomega:v:26:y:1998:i:4:p:541-547

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/supportfaq.cws_home/regional
https://shop.elsevie ... _01_ooc_1&version=01

Access Statistics for this article

Omega is currently edited by B. Lev

More articles in Omega from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-19
Handle: RePEc:eee:jomega:v:26:y:1998:i:4:p:541-547