EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Spatial heterogeneity in composite indicator: A methodological proposal

Elisa Fusco, Francesco Vidoli and Biresh K. Sahoo

Omega, 2018, vol. 77, issue C, 1-14

Abstract: Most of the existing literature on the construction of composite indicator (CI) in the Benefit of the Doubt (BoD) framework fails to consider the exogenous external (tangible or intangible) factors, which might have influences on individual components of the CI. The present research proposes an original method to estimate the CI by considering the external factors directly into the robust BoD model. More specifically, a particular focus has been devoted to the “spatial conditioning” in which much of the underlying observed differences in CI scores may be attributed to a multitude of territorial conditional variables. The proposed method is illustrated using two data sets: one containing simulated data and the other one relative to real data covering the social supply delivered by the Italian municipalities. Results stress the importance of properly taking into account the local non-independence of the units in order to better separate the performances of individual units by the contribution of their territories.

Keywords: Data envelopment analysis; Composite indicator; Benefit of the Doubt; Spatial heterogeneity (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2018
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: Track citations by RSS feed

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0305048317302025
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:jomega:v:77:y:2018:i:c:p:1-14

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/supportfaq.cws_home/regional
https://shop.elsevie ... _01_ooc_1&version=01

Access Statistics for this article

Omega is currently edited by B. Lev

More articles in Omega from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Dana Niculescu ().

 
Page updated 2019-10-11
Handle: RePEc:eee:jomega:v:77:y:2018:i:c:p:1-14