How large do multi-region models need to be?
Florenz Plassmann and
Andrew Feltenstein ()
Journal of Policy Modeling, 2016, vol. 38, issue 1, 138-155
Abstract:
Given the connectedness of most states with their neighbors, any economic analysis of changes in a state's policy needs to account for the interdependence between states. We examine in how much detail one needs to model the factor and commodity flows between states, and how much, if anything, is lost in the aggregation of neighboring states into larger regions. We develop nine dynamic multi-region general equilibrium models of the United States, with different aggregations of states (a two-region model, a 7-region model, and a full 51-region model) and different assumptions regarding intermediate inputs. We examine the same policy change with these nine models and find that all nine models suggest very similar economic effects of the policy change in the first year. Our overall conclusion is that small and highly aggregate models are not necessarily any less accurate than larger models.
Keywords: Multi-region tax model; Non-Armington; Computational general equilibrium (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2016
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)
Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0161893815001155
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
Related works:
Working Paper: How large do multi-region models need to be? (2015) 
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:jpolmo:v:38:y:2016:i:1:p:138-155
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpolmod.2015.12.005
Access Statistics for this article
Journal of Policy Modeling is currently edited by A. M. Costa
More articles in Journal of Policy Modeling from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu ().