Mine mechanisation and distributional conflict in rural South Africa
Sonwabile Mnwana and
Resources Policy, 2018, vol. 59, issue C, 227-237
•Policy has sought to improve mining labour rights and developmental contribution.•Labour intensive PGM mining business models have proven unsustainable.•Industry leaders expect mechanisation to restore legitimacy and profitability.•However, mechanisation may generate new tensions and community conflict.•Mine-community mediation by tribal authorities has proven dysfunctional.
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:jrpoli:v:59:y:2018:i:c:p:227-237
Access Statistics for this article
Resources Policy is currently edited by R. G. Eggert
More articles in Resources Policy from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Dana Niculescu ().