Revisiting the Prebisch-Singer hypothesis of a secular decline in the terms of trade of primary commodities (1900–2016). A dynamic regime approach
Vincent Geronimi and
Armand Taranco
Resources Policy, 2018, vol. 59, issue C, 329-339
Abstract:
We revisit the Prebisch–Singer hypothesis of a secular decline in the terms of trade of primary commodities (TTPC) by adopting an approach that differs from previous research. We implement two approaches of time series – the mixing distribution methodology and the Markov regime-switching models – that have not yet been mobilised for the analysis of TTPC in the long-term. These two approaches allow the identification of a succession of three different dynamic regimes in the TTPC over the 1900–2016 period. The third regime (1986–2005) is characterised by the lowest level of terms of trade of the whole period, and the return to the second regime after 2005 is associated with a level of price significantly higher (57,5% higher). Such an upward shift in primary commodities’ prices is unprecedented at the scale of the 20th century and could be an opportunity for developing countries specialised in primary exportations.
Keywords: Commodity prices; Terms of trade; Long-term fluctuations; Structural breaks; Markov switching model; Mixing distribution (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: O13 O19 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2018
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (2)
Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301420718302101
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
Related works:
Working Paper: Revisiting the Prebisch-Singer hypothesis of a secular decline in the terms of trade of primary commodities (1900–2016). A dynamic regime approach (2018)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:jrpoli:v:59:y:2018:i:c:p:329-339
DOI: 10.1016/j.resourpol.2018.08.005
Access Statistics for this article
Resources Policy is currently edited by R. G. Eggert
More articles in Resources Policy from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu ().