EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Proposing two novel hybrid intelligence models for forecasting copper price based on extreme learning machine and meta-heuristic algorithms

Hong Zhang, Hoang Nguyen, Xuan-Nam Bui, Biswajeet Pradhan, Ngoc-Luan Mai and Diep-Anh Vu

Resources Policy, 2021, vol. 73, issue C

Abstract: The focus of this study aims at developing two novel hybrid intelligence models for forecasting copper prices in the future with high accuracy based on the extreme learning machine (ELM) and two meta-heuristic algorithms (i.e., particle swarm optimization (PSO) and genetic algorithm (GA)), named as PSO-ELM and GA-ELM models. Accordingly, the time series datasets of the copper price for thirty years were collected based on the influencing parameters, such as crude oil, iron ore, gold, silver, and natural gas prices. Furthermore, the exchange rate of the four largest countries in copper-producing, including Chile (USD/CLP), China (USD/CNY), Peru (USD/PEN), and Australia (USD/AUD), were also considered to evaluate the copper prices. The GA and PSO algorithms then optimized the weights and biases of the ELM model to reduce the error of the ELM model for forecasting copper price. The traditional ELM model (without optimization), and artificial neural networks (ANN) were also developed as the comparative models for resulting in convincing experimental results in the proposed PSO-ELM and GA-ELM models. The results indicated that the proposed hybrid PSO-ELM and GA-ELM models could forecast copper price with higher accuracy and reliability over the traditional ELM and ANN models. Of those, the PSO-ELM yielded the most dominant accuracy with a root-mean-squared error (RMSE) of 304.943, mean absolute error (MAE) of 241.946, mean absolute percentage error (MAPE) of 0.037, and mean absolute scaled error (MASE) of 0.933. The t-test and Wilcoxon test also demonstrated the statistical significance of the proposed models and the best 95% confident interval of the PSO-ELM model with the range of $177.046 to $67.054 with p-value = 2.589e-05. Whereas, the GA-ELM model provided the forecasted copper price higher $137.233 than the actual copper price, and the 95% confidence interval is from $189.672 to $84.793 with p-value = 1.027e-06.

Keywords: Copper price; Forecasting price; Natural resources; Extreme learning machine; Optimization algorithms; Hybrid models (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2021
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (8) Track citations by RSS feed

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301420721002099
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:jrpoli:v:73:y:2021:i:c:s0301420721002099

DOI: 10.1016/j.resourpol.2021.102195

Access Statistics for this article

Resources Policy is currently edited by R. G. Eggert

More articles in Resources Policy from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu ().

 
Page updated 2023-05-18
Handle: RePEc:eee:jrpoli:v:73:y:2021:i:c:s0301420721002099