Livelihood coping strategies among displaced small scale miners in Ghana

Franklin N. Mabe, Ebenezer Owusu-Sekyere and Oluyemi Theophilus Adeosun

Resources Policy, 2021, vol. 74, issue C

Abstract: One major sub-sector that contributes immensely to job creation among people in rural Ghana is small scale mining. Notwithstanding, it has spawned land degradation, water pollution and regular reports of death attributed to pit collapse but these do not deter the miners from such enterprise. Government's attempt to streamline the sector through a moratorium has deprived the miners from their livelihood, compelling them to adopt alternative livelihood strategies. This study investigated the livelihood coping strategies adopted by the displaced miners. Cross-sectional data were collected using a semi-structured questionnaire. A multivariate probit model was used to analyze the determinants of the coping strategies. The three livelihood coping strategies adopted by miners were farming, trading, and labor supply. Of the three, farming emerged as the most dominant livelihood coping strategy. Institutional factors, personal characteristics, and location-specific factors influenced the adoption of livelihood coping strategies. The paper suggests the need to understand the far reaching livelihood implications of policy decisions on regulating the small scale mining sector. Therefore, there is the need for duty bearers to design tailor-made training programmes for the displaced miners and the employers to capacitate them in coping with the ban. This paper highlights that good policies also have negative consequences that need to be managed well by the government and other stakeholders.

Keywords: Coping strategies; Galamsey; Livelihood; Mining; Moratorium (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2021
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (3)

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301420721003020
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:jrpoli:v:74:y:2021:i:c:s0301420721003020

DOI: 10.1016/j.resourpol.2021.102291

Access Statistics for this article

Resources Policy is currently edited by R. G. Eggert

More articles in Resources Policy from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu ().