A comparison of copper use in China and India as a proxy for their economic development

Karine M. Renaud, Ross Manley and Nedal T. Nassar

Resources Policy, 2023, vol. 80, issue C

Abstract: The analysis examines the interconnection between copper flows into use (copper intensity of use) and the wider economic structures of China and India by presenting a copper flow model for years 2000, 2005, 2010, and 2015 and conducting regression analysis for the period 1999 to 2015. The copper flow model illustrates China’s shift in focus from copper mining to manufacturing. The model shows mining/milling is the stage with the lowest production in copper for both countries. From 2000 to 2015, copper ore processed in China increased by 188%, while domestic finished goods production and copper flows into use experienced a rapid growth of 390% and 331%, respectively. The ore processed in India decreased by 19% from 2000 to 2015. India’s domestic finished goods production and copper flows into use grew by 178% and by 182%, respectively, during the same period. From 2000 to 2015, China’s net imports of concentrates increased by 719%, while India’s grew by 300%. In contrast, China is a net exporter of copper contained in finished goods, while India is a net importer of copper contained finished goods. China’s net exports increased by 1182%, India’s net imports by 344% over the same time period. Regression analysis indicates that both the degree of investment as a percentage of GDP and unobserved heterogeneity between China and India help to explain the difference in copper intensity of use between China and India for the period from 1999 to 2015.

Keywords: Material flow analysis; Mineral consumption; Mineral production; Metal cycles; Industrial ecology (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2023
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301420722006389
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:jrpoli:v:80:y:2023:i:c:s0301420722006389

DOI: 10.1016/j.resourpol.2022.103195

Access Statistics for this article

Resources Policy is currently edited by R. G. Eggert

More articles in Resources Policy from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu ().