Life cycle triple bottom line sustainability assessment of coal mine overburden sand versus river sand

Anshumali Mishra, Sarat Kumar Das and Krishna R. Reddy

Resources Policy, 2023, vol. 86, issue PA

Abstract: Crushed coal mine overburden (OB) waste rock has been found to be a promising, robust, and reliable alternative of river sand as fine aggregate in several construction applications. The processing of OB to application ready specification requires preprocessing that may cause negative environmental impacts. The environmental impacts have been quantified in previous studies. However, the economic and social impacts were not addressed, which has created confusion among practitioners and policy makers to take initiatives in promoting OB sand as a sustainable geomaterial considering the triple bottom line (environmental, economic, and social) approach. The present study uses Quantitative Assessment of Life Cycle Sustainability (QUALICS) framework that incorporates Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) and Integrated Value Model for Sustainable Assessment (MIVES) for integrated triple bottom line (environmental, economic, and social) assessment of processing of OB sand versus typical river sand. OB sand is found to cause relatively less impact in 6 out of 10 indicators in environmental assessment. High direct cost is neutralized by the monetized environmental benefit, direct benefits, and indirect benefits. The social score rating of OB sand is found to be relatively higher than river sand for all four criteria of social assessment (individual, community, socio-environmental, and socio-economic). The integrated sustainability indices for OB sand and river sand were determined to be 0.60 and 0.33, respectively, when equal weightage was given to all three triple bottom line aspects. These results clearly demonstrate that OB sand is a more sustainable option compared to river sand. Furthermore, conducting a sensitivity analysis with increased weightages assigned to the economic and social aspects reaffirmed that OB sand can be a sustainable replacement to river sand as fine aggregate.

Keywords: Coalmine overburden sand; River sand; Processing; Life cycle assessment; Cost-benefit analysis; Social impacts; Triple bottom line; Multi-criteria decision analysis; Sustainability index (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2023
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301420723008516
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:jrpoli:v:86:y:2023:i:pa:s0301420723008516

DOI: 10.1016/j.resourpol.2023.104140

Access Statistics for this article

Resources Policy is currently edited by R. G. Eggert

More articles in Resources Policy from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu ().