Regional post-mining land use assessment: An interdisciplinary and multi-stakeholder approach

Sandy Worden, Kamila Svobodova, Claire Côte and Pascal Bolz

Resources Policy, 2024, vol. 89, issue C

Abstract: Mine closure is regulated and planned on an individual site basis and selection of post-mining land uses (PMLUs) are commonly considered from that perspective. Some mining jurisdictions, such as Queensland in Australia, are starting to acknowledge the need for wider regional planning approaches in which PMLU selection considers regional and local planning strategies, the surrounding landscape and community views. Shifting thinking from site-specific planning to regional scale offers strategic advantages including the ability to consider options that are only viable at scale and to reinstate larger expanses of native bushland or functional agricultural land. Assessing and selecting PMLU options at regional scale requires an interdisciplinary approach that incorporates diverse technical, planning and social stakeholders. However, there is little guidance on how to conduct an assessment of this type at this scale. A collaborative regional PMLU assessment methodology is presented that addresses this gap. The methodology explicitly focuses on the complex contextual factors found in different mining regions to determine what PMLUs a region is capable of sustaining. The methodology provides a path for collaboration between mine operators, governments, regulators and regional stakeholders by providing data that supports their quest for viable post-mining futures. It enables regional stakeholders to start a conversation about what PMLUs are suitable for the region and to foster a collaborative approach to the first stage of PMLU decision-making. The methodology is intended to be a precursor to more detailed decision analysis. Importantly, it does not eliminate the need for planning and decision-making at the mine level.

Keywords: Sustainability; Mining; Mine closure; Post-mining land use; Multi-criteria baseline; Stakeholder collaboration (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2024
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (2)

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301420724000473
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:jrpoli:v:89:y:2024:i:c:s0301420724000473

DOI: 10.1016/j.resourpol.2024.104680

Access Statistics for this article

Resources Policy is currently edited by R. G. Eggert

More articles in Resources Policy from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu ().