Beyond closure: A literature review and research agenda for post-mining transitions

Thomas Measham, Jim Walker, Fiona Haslam McKenzie, Jason Kirby, Caroline Williams, Jillian D'Urso, Anna Littleboy, Agnes Samper, Rebecca Rey, Bryan Maybee, David Brereton and Guy Boggs

Resources Policy, 2024, vol. 90, issue C

Abstract: Post-mining transition is a growing area of interest in research, policy and practice. One of the key reasons for this growing attention is the increasing number of mines closing, and expected to close, in coming decades around the world. Another reason for the heightened focus on closure and transition stems from the poor track record of closure and relinquishment of mines. Thousands of mines sit in an idle state of ‘care and maintenance’ partly because of the difficulties involved in closing a mine and concerns about transfer of residual liability for sites. The growing importance of successful closure and post-mining transition can be conceptualised in relation to recent phenomena. These include the development of just transition narratives which are strongly tied to the de-carbonisation agenda. Another is the focus within industry on post-mining land use (PMLU). There are few examples of successful post-mining transition to learn from. One such example - the post-coal transition in Germany - offers some lessons however there are limits to the transferability of these lessons to other contexts. In response to these challenges, this paper puts forward a research agenda comprising four key areas. The first of these is the need for research and deliberation on what post-mining means in different contexts, as there is a lack of shared understanding of what post-mining is or should be. The second is the need to incorporate a wider range of values and perspectives into analysis, planning, decision-making and actions about closure and transitions. The third area is the need for greater attention to integration between the technical, biophysical and engineering dimensions of closure and transition, and how these intersect with cultural, social and economic dimensions. A fourth need is to elevate the scale at which research and decision-making about closure occurs, from the site to the regional scale and beyond. Collectively, these four areas underpin a shift in thinking beyond notions of returning to prior state and instead focus on the opportunities for post-mining communities and economies.

Keywords: Mine closure; Repurposing; Just transition; Regional development; Post-mining land use; Indigenous (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2024
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301420724002265
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:jrpoli:v:90:y:2024:i:c:s0301420724002265

DOI: 10.1016/j.resourpol.2024.104859

Access Statistics for this article

Resources Policy is currently edited by R. G. Eggert

More articles in Resources Policy from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu ().