Negative equity and foreclosure: Theory and evidence
Christopher Foote (),
Kristopher Gerardi () and
Journal of Urban Economics, 2008, vol. 64, issue 2, 234-245
Recent declines in housing prices have focused attention on the relationship between negative housing equity and mortgage default. Theory implies that negative equity is a necessary condition for default, but not a sufficient one. This often-misunderstood result is clearly illustrated in a dataset of Massachusetts homeowners during the early 1990s; fewer than 10 percent of borrowers likely to have had negative equity at the end of 1991 experienced a foreclosure during the following three years. An econometric model of default estimated on two decades of Massachusetts housing data also predicts low default rates for current negative-equity borrowers. We develop a simple theoretical model to interpret these empirical findings and to assess potential foreclosure-reduction policies. Our results imply that lenders and policymakers face an information problem in trying to help borrowers with negative equity, because it is hard to determine which owners really need help in order to stay in their homes.
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (229) Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
Working Paper: Negative equity and foreclosure: theory and evidence (2008)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:juecon:v:64:y:2008:i:2:p:234-245
Access Statistics for this article
Journal of Urban Economics is currently edited by S.S. Rosenthal and W.C. Strange
More articles in Journal of Urban Economics from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Haili He ().