British utility regulation: Consolidation, existential angst, or fiasco?
Martin Lodge and
Jon Stern ()
Utilities Policy, 2014, vol. 31, issue C, 146-151
More than thirty years since the ‘Littlechild Report’ put forward an agenda for incentive-based and competition-driven regulation, the time has come to reconsider its legacy. This article places the debates surrounding utility regulation in context. First, it suggests that at least three dominant interpretations exist regarding the legacy of the Littlechild Report. Second, this article explores the original theoretical arguments that underpinned the proposals underpinning the Report. Third, this article considers the contemporary challenges for utility regulation in the UK and elsewhere. Despite considerable concern about the state of utilities, and of utility regulation, the legacy of market-oriented regulation has been consolidated, especially in telecommunications.
Keywords: Utility regulation; Littlechild Report; UK utility regulation; International reform (search for similar items in EconPapers)
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (2) Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:juipol:v:31:y:2014:i:c:p:146-151
Access Statistics for this article
Utilities Policy is currently edited by D. Smith
More articles in Utilities Policy from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Haili He ().